Re: autoconf-refactor and netfilter-

From: Henrik Nordström <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 21:02:42 +0200

Ok for me, recommended even with incremental changes easier to review
and verify. But please remember to visually inspect each change with bzr
diff before commit. Catches most stupid things. This applies to all of
us myself included.

 ---- Originalmedd. ----
Från: Kinkie <gkinkie_at_gmail.com>
Skickat: 21 maj 2010 05:43 -07:00
Till: Henrik Nordström <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>, Alex Rousskov <rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com>, Squid Developers <squid-dev_at_squid-cache.org>
Ämne: Re: autoconf-refactor and netfilter-based transparent proxy

Hi all.

To avoid risking this to happen again, i'll do more frequent interim
merges while using trunk to baseline the output.

Any objections?

Thanks

On 5/10/10, Henrik Nordström <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net> wrote:
> mån 2010-05-10 klockan 18:13 +0200 skrev Kinkie:
>> >> revno: 10425
>> >> committer: Francesco Chemolli <kinkie_at_squid-cache.org>
>> >> branch nick: trunk
>> >> timestamp: Sun 2010-04-25 23:40:51 +0200
>> >> message:
>> >> Interim merge from autoconf-refactor feature-branch.
>> >
>> > Kinkie, could you please check that netfilter-based interception proxies
>> > are still supported?
>>
>> Will do ASAP (probably tomorrow).
>
> I have added back the missing define for LINUX_NETFILTER, but this is
> the second odd thing in the autoconf refactor merge. Can you please do a
> full review of your merge to see if there is anything else that's odd?
>
>> > It would also be nice to get rid of libcap and TPROXY warnings when the
>> > user wants just netfilter-based interception proxy support and is
>> > willing to --disable the rest. In Squid v3.1, we now get these
>> > irrelevant (for the said configuration) warnings:
>>
>> I'll check.
>
> trunk does not even have a c
Received on Fri May 21 2010 - 19:02:47 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat May 22 2010 - 12:00:11 MDT