Re: food for thought?

>> Maybe there are some hints we could use..
>
> Useful, but not revolutionary.

Never claimed it was

> But yes, a VM based store has it's benefits, but for that to work for us
> a different design is needed more along the lines of Varnish, making
> heavy use of worker threads for mostly every operation, not just one per
> core.

Actually the thing I found the most interesting is that it suggests to
use page-aware object placements so that big structures traversal is
easier on the VM. Could it be useful to adopt that for some of our
low-level indexes? We do have a few hashes and trees laying around
which maybe could benefit from this; and adopting an alternate
algorithm for those may not have a big impact code-wise..

-- 
    /kinkie