Re: new/delete overloading, why?

From: Henrik Nordstr�m <henrik_at_henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 01:20:18 +0200

sön 2010-08-22 klockan 17:18 +1200 skrev Amos Jeffries:

> We should add a small compiler unit-test into configure for a while
> before removing either way. No guess work then.

Do you mean a unit-test to test if the compiler warns about free()
abuses on data allocated by new?

Regards
Henrik
Received on Sun Aug 22 2010 - 23:20:22 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Amos Jeffries: "Re: RFC-2640 support in Squid"
Previous message: Henrik Nordstr�m: "Re: RFC-2640 support in Squid"
In reply to: Amos Jeffries: "Re: new/delete overloading, why?"
Next in thread: Amos Jeffries: "Re: new/delete overloading, why?"
Reply: Amos Jeffries: "Re: new/delete overloading, why?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Aug 23 2010 - 12:00:05 MDT