Re: GPLv3 license

Henrik Nordström wrote:
> Just noticed the external_acl/eDirectory_userip is licensed by GPLv3 or
> later. This is inconsistent with the rest of the code which is GPLv2 or
> later, and is also what we announce as main license for the distribution
> as a whole. I see a risk here that the eDirectory_userip gets mislabeled
> as having a GPLv2 or later license like the rest.
>
> I do not think moving Squid as such to GPLv3 or later is appropriate
> solution.
>

The author confirmed in bugzilla that he was happy with it being labeled
GPLv2 and changed the COPYING file over before I merged.
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2905

We seem to have missed some of the GPL references in the update. Sorry.

Are there any other requirements that you know of apart from switching
the 3 to a 2 in those statements?

Amos

-- 
Please be using
   Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.7
   Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.1