Re: [PATCH] [RFC] pconn directive cleanup

From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov_at_measurement-factory.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:04:11 -0700

On 11/06/2011 11:12 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:

> + This is only relevant when persistent client connections
> + are enabled. Non-persistent connections will close
> + immediately after each request is completed.

I would remove the above addition as obvious and slightly awkward OR
rephrase it to just say something like "This option does not affect
non-persistent client connections which are closed immediately after
last use".

The patch looks good to me.

It would be useful to document whether setting the timeout to zero is
meaningful as a way to optimize one-after-another requests without
creating a lot of idle persistent connections.

Thank you,

Alex.
Received on Mon Nov 07 2011 - 21:04:26 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Nov 08 2011 - 12:00:11 MST