Re: [RFC] merging NTLM and Negotiate scheme components

From: Amos Jeffries <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:30:48 +1300

On 17/12/2011 3:31 p.m., Henrik Nordström wrote:
> And a sligthly better cleaned up patch.
>
> Basically it boils down to a different form of AF/NA responses where the
> negotiate/kerberos responses includes a blob that needs to be sent to
> the requesting client, while ntlm just has username or message in the
> helper response.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
>
> lör 2011-12-17 klockan 03:12 +0100 skrev Henrik Nordström:
>
>> Attached is a patch showing the tiny differences between Negotiate and
>> NTLM in the 3.0 sources.
>>
>> Have not attempted doing the same in later sources as I expect they have
>> drifted further apart there when restructured a bit.
>>
>> Regards
>> Henrik

Omitting symbol names, the difference should now be that blob, the
virtual type() function used to generate headers, and fixHeaders
emitting Authentication-Info details fror Negotiate.

Amos
Received on Sat Dec 17 2011 - 03:30:58 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Dec 17 2011 - 12:00:08 MST