Re: [RFC] merging NTLM and Negotiate scheme components

From: Markus Moeller <huaraz_at_moeller.plus.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:51:08 -0000

Hi Amos,

  I assume this will also eliminate the need of my negotiate_wrapper helper.

Markus

"Amos Jeffries" <squid3_at_treenet.co.nz> wrote in message
news:4EEC0CE8.9040409_at_treenet.co.nz...
> On 17/12/2011 3:31 p.m., Henrik Nordström wrote:
>> And a sligthly better cleaned up patch.
>>
>> Basically it boils down to a different form of AF/NA responses where the
>> negotiate/kerberos responses includes a blob that needs to be sent to
>> the requesting client, while ntlm just has username or message in the
>> helper response.
>>
>> Regards
>> Henrik
>>
>>
>> lör 2011-12-17 klockan 03:12 +0100 skrev Henrik Nordström:
>>
>>> Attached is a patch showing the tiny differences between Negotiate and
>>> NTLM in the 3.0 sources.
>>>
>>> Have not attempted doing the same in later sources as I expect they have
>>> drifted further apart there when restructured a bit.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Henrik
>
> Omitting symbol names, the difference should now be that blob, the virtual
> type() function used to generate headers, and fixHeaders emitting
> Authentication-Info details fror Negotiate.
>
> Amos
>
>
Received on Sat Dec 17 2011 - 14:51:34 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Dec 18 2011 - 12:00:04 MST