On 02/01/2013 04:01 AM, Kinkie wrote:
> Is there any objection for me to entertain myself doing "int" ->
> "intXX_t" and "unisgned int -> uintXX_t" conversions in the meanwhile?
> This seems to be in line with c++11 changes, and should have no
> adverse effects.
The immediate adverse effect would be conflicts with other pending
features, of course.
What is the motivation behind this? Why intXX_t is better than int when
we do not really care about the exact variable size?
Thank you,
Alex.
Received on Fri Feb 01 2013 - 17:08:38 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Feb 01 2013 - 12:00:15 MST