In memory objects efficency

From: Florian Lohoff <flo@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 17:53:57 +0200 (CEST)

Hi,
as i read the thread of the SS1000 with 310M and 78MB for In Memory Objects
i was think how effective those in memory caching is. I myself reduced
this in memory objects very much as i think it only consumes memory.

For understanding. These in memory objects are the Ram equivalent for
the swap (HD) storage, correct ? It does no caching for writing to disc
or whatever doesnt it ? So does Squid analyse the hit rate for
in-memory cache seperately somewhere ?

Flo

-- 
Florian Lohoff     mailto:flo@mini.gt.owl.de      Phone:+49-5241-340796
Privates Internet Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Guetersloh - http://www.gt.owl.de
Received on Fri Oct 18 1996 - 08:54:19 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:33:18 MST