Re: minimum-cache time?+

From: James R Grinter <jrg@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 13:41:38 +0000

On Sun 27 Oct, 1996, "Miguel A.L. Paraz" <map@iphil.net> wrote:
>Which will ignore cache-control, Expires: immediately, and the like.
>Or, is it a HTTP protocol violation?

that's a real bad thing to do. We don't cache any of msn.com, because
their 'make your own homepage' includes personal details; and the
headers allow it to be cached by an HTTP/1.0 cache for half an hour.

They send the same 'cache-control: private' headers as microsoft.com,
but unfortunately they're 1.1 headers being sent in a 1.0 response
to a 1.0 request, and they include an Expires: header giving a life time
of 30 minutes (intended to be the time that the browser keeps the document,
but it doesn't quite get treated like that).

James.
Received on Sun Oct 27 1996 - 05:41:54 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:33:22 MST