Re: minimum-cache time?+

From: Miguel A.L. Paraz <>
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 14:41:13 +0000 ()


David J N Begley wrote:

> I don't get it - why is this necessary when (certainly from our stats, and
> seemingly others based upon problems people are seeing with Microsoft's
> site) clearly Microsoft's stuff can be cached *already*? Or does Squid
> 1.1 act differently to 1.0?

Perhaps for other objects within MS, but,
tells us not to cache it, three times in the MIME headers.
> Hasn't stopped anyone else causing problems - why should it stop us from
> trying to fix 'em (as terrible as protocol violation is)?

Yeah, but if we break protocols in response to others breaking them,
the word "protocol" loses it's meaning...

miguel a.l. paraz  <>  PGP: 0x43F0D011
iphil communications:  isp/intranet design and implementation, makati city, ph
Received on Sun Oct 27 1996 - 06:53:41 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:33:22 MST