Re: Ideas/solutions to caching identical objects ...

From: Duane Wessels <>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 96 12:37:13 -0800 writes:

>You maintain an index of UR[LIN] -> MD5 mappings.
>Of course, the same could be done with an index of MD5 -> UR[LIN] mappings,
>but the former is one-to-many, while the latter is many-to-one.

I must've missed something. I thought the goal was to increase hit
counts on identical objects with different names. I don't see
how this helps since the request doesn't include the MD5.

Duane W.
Received on Tue Dec 03 1996 - 12:42:43 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:33:49 MST