Re: Bad HTML conversion?

From: Cord Beermann, Webmaster der FH Lippe <>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 18:47:03 +0100 (MET)

Hallo! Du (Trevor Paquette) hast geschrieben:

>Try loading the following..

>Does it look right to you?

>Not to me.. looks like it's displaying the raw HTML...

Yes to me, too.

OK. lets have a look on the content-type-Header from that Server:

HTTP/1.0 200 OK
Server: Netscape-Enterprise/2.0a
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 17:40:25 GMT
Accept-ranges: bytes
Last-modified: Sun, 16 Feb 1997 10:17:19 GMT
Content-length: 30269
Content-type: text/html

that IS HTML.

Hmmm. lets look at the source of that document ...

<TITLE>computer-security/anonymous-ftp FAQ (HTML Version)</TITLE>
<H1>computer-security/anonymous-ftp FAQ (HTML Version)</H1>
Archive-name: computer-security/anonymous-ftp-faq
Post-Frequency: monthly
Last-modified: 1996/7/16
Version: 3.0
&#60;TITLE&#62;Anonymous FTP FAQ&#60;/TITLE&#62;

great. They have converted that document and quoted all the < and >.
You see the HTML Tags in the rendered version. But that is the
correct behaviour for that document.


Cord Beermann, Webmaster der FH Lippe
Received on Tue Mar 11 1997 - 10:03:53 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:34:40 MST