RE: Caching of /cgi-bin/ and '?' ?

From: Holger Schreck <eurhos@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 18:24:55 +0200

Yes, the cgi-bin files will be cached but they come with an "expires
now" header and
nobody can profit from the cached file.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cord@cc.fh-lippe.de [SMTP:cord@cc.fh-lippe.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 1997 11:45 AM
> To: toens@highway.bertelsmann.de
> Cc: squid-users@nlanr.net
> Subject: Re: Caching of /cgi-bin/ and '?' ?
>
> Hallo! Du (Toens Bueker) hast geschrieben:
>
> >I tried to convince squid of caching URLs including '/cgi-bin/'
> >and '?' (just for testing).
>
> >Is it sufficient to delete '/cgi-bin/' and '?' from
> >cache_stoplist and hierarchy_stoplist? Or does an empty
> >cache_stoplist-line make squid switch back to
> >default-mode, which means that URLs with '/cgi-bin/' and
> >'?' are still not cached?
>
> AFAIK not. delete the /cgi-bin/ and ? from cache_stoplist and they
> will be cached (If they are fetched with the GET method).
>
> Cord
>
> --
> Cord Beermann http://www.Wunder-Nett.org/~cord/
> cord@Wunder-Nett.org IRC: Cord@Wunder-Nett
Received on Wed Jun 11 1997 - 09:34:50 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:35:30 MST