Re: IMS instead of "reload"

From: Henrik Nordstrom <>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 1997 11:35:20 +0200

After giving this some seconds of thought, it seems like a bad idea. If
a object is replaced with a older copy of the same size then there is no
way to refresh it.

But such an action is of course a major error by the provider...

Henrik Nordström
Christian Balzer wrote:
> And if I look at my  wishlist for Squid it still lists the option
> to substitute _all_ Reload/Refresh/Pragma no_cache requests with
> IMS ones if feasible (read the object must have a date and the server
> must handle the IMS request, which should be true for the majority of
> things)...
Received on Sat Jul 26 1997 - 04:01:28 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:35:50 MST