Re: Squid vs. Netscape Proxy

From: Michael Ferioli <>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 16:26:37 +0300

At 09:24 AM 4/21/98 -0400, Michael Pelletier wrote:
>On Tue, 21 Apr 1998, Michael Ferioli wrote:
>> At 09:12 AM 4/21/98 +1200, Joe Abley wrote:
>> >
>> >I think the original poster was talking about distributing three caches
>> >(or cache clusters) in the wide area. A cluster of unix boxes running
>> >squid in each city (with round-robin DNS set up to spread load across each
>> >machine in the cluster) should work pretty well.
>> Exactly. But do you really think DNS round robin is a good solution?
>> Why would an Ankara user use the Istanbul Cache? That wastes
>> bandwidth which kind of defeats the whole idea of proxying.
>If that's the case, then proxy.pac is the clear solution -- just use the
>"myIpAddressIs()" function and the "isInNet()" function and pick the
>appropriate proxy server based on that. However, the original poster
>mentioned "CARP," which is a load-balancing, cache-sharing protocol, isn't

Yes, there is no question that .pac files will work, but for which browsers?
Someone said earlier in the list that IE4 broke autoconfig. Is that


Michael Ferioli
Comnet A.S.
Received on Tue Apr 21 1998 - 06:34:22 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:39:47 MST