Re: performance of 1.1 vs. 1.2

> This is best answered with some hard numbers from my test machine:
>
> random
> fill(1) read read
> Squid 1.1.21 : 35 42 34
> Squid 1.2b20-1: 42 105(2) 60
>
> (1) Cache fill probably injured a major penalty from the local HTTP
> server sharing one of the disks.
> (2) Sequential read using 1.2b20-1 was CPU bound.

How do I compare those numbers? Are those in ticks (or jiffies), hence 1.2
is slower than 1.1? Or are they some benchmark rating where higher is better.

Sorry if this is a silly or obvious question... :)

=Robert=
Received on Thu May 14 1998 - 23:54:21 MDT