On 28 Oct 1998 anri@polynet.lviv.ua wrote:
>
> Hi Henrik!
> It should sound a bit marvellous, but i want run TWO separate Squids,
> using ONE (the same) cache.
> Those Squids should have different configuration for ports, delay pools,
> redirects, acl and so on, but identical in part of cache management.
>
> Does it hurt my cache? I dont wanna loose it.
What if you run TREE squid's like this:
Two "children" with ZERO (or almost zero) swap space and
One parent that receives requests from _only_ these two "children" with all
cache swap under its control.
It should act like a "cache manager/server" that treats read/writes to disk
and the clients to this service. (Hmmm! could this client/server implementation
be in future versions?)
Henrik, does it work as expected?
Could anyone complete/destroy my suggestion?
Ethy H. Brito /"\
InterNexo Ltda. \ / CAMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML
(012) 341-6860 X ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL
Sao Jose dos Campos / \
Sao Paulo - Brazil
Received on Wed Oct 28 1998 - 07:21:29 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:42:50 MST