Re: squid on SCSI with linux

From: Miquel van Smoorenburg <list-squid@dont-contact.us>
Date: 30 Dec 1998 20:15:43 +0100

In article <cistron.02fe01be3415$cc9ea860$4701020a@erutku>,
Utku Er <erutku@netone.net.tr> wrote:
> I get a 9 Gig. SCSI for my squid machine which is running linux... What
>is the best filesystem for squid on linux...
>is ext2 good solution ??? Do I have some other alternatives ??

ext2 is just fine.

> I mkfs.ext2 on my 9.17 Gig. SCSI and Linux df -k says 8.1 Gig. available...
>what happened to my 1 Gig. which is a good place to cache ?

9.17 disk GB == 9 170 000 000 bytes. Now if you define a GB as 1024*1024*1024
you'll see that 9 170 000 000 bytes == 8.54 GB. And that is the way Linux
shows it to you. 9.17 GB is marketing speak for a 8.5 GB disk.

Also, ext2 reserves 5% of the available data for emergencies (only root
can write to it) and for performance reasons, speed and avoidance of
fragmentation. So 8.54 GB - 5% == 8.1 GB.

Mike.

-- 
Indifference will certainly be the downfall of mankind, but who cares?
-- 
The From: and Reply-To: addresses are internal news2mail gateway addresses.
Reply to the list or to miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg)
Received on Wed Dec 30 1998 - 11:53:37 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:43:46 MST