On Sat, 26 Jun 1999, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
> Comparing these, indeed, I can only conclude that the second one does *not*
> have the leak. I.e. the worst (or most optimistic) leak is:
> 9184/895997*1024 = 10.5 bytes/request
>
> Not even close to 36.
> Are you certain the smaller server experiences the leak as well eventually?
No. Like I said in my previous message, I'm not really sure it has the
leak because it was just put in place late last week. I have been keeping
a close eye on it, and the process has been growing slowly, but a certain
amount of that is normal for squid. It's not been running long enough to
really say anything about it.
----don't waste your cpu, crack rc5...www.distributed.net team enzo---
Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*| Spammers will be winnuked or
System Administrator | nestea'd...whatever it takes
Atlantic Net | to get the job done.
_________http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key__________
Received on Sat Jun 26 1999 - 14:58:30 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:47:00 MST