UDP_HIT but TCP_MISS on Same Request?

From: David S. Madole <david@dont-contact.us>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 02:55:41 -0400

Is there any legitimate way that Squid 2.1.PATCH2 and 2.2.PATCH4 can
both be generating these types of log entries?:

-----

1999/09/10 02:45:11 0 192.168.52.8 UDP_HIT/000 67 ICP_QUERY
http://image.weather.com/pics/weather_logo.gif - NONE/- -
1999/09/10 02:45:11 19 192.168.52.8 TCP_MISS/404 333 GET
http://image.weather.com/pics/weather_logo.gif -
SINGLE_PARENT/proxy1.omdev.com text/html

-----

Why is it responding UDP_HIT if it doesn't have the object, or why
isn't it using the object in cache? Here's the config file:

-----

visible_hostname proxy.omdev.com
unique_hostname proxy3.omdev.com

http_port 8080
icp_port 3130

cache_effective_user cache
cache_effective_group cache

cache_peer proxy1.omdev.com parent 8080 3130 no-query default
cache_peer proxy2.omdev.com sibling 8080 3130 no-query

cache_mem 10 MB
maximum_object_size 100 MB
cache_dir /var/spool/squid/00 4350 16 256
cache_dir /var/spool/squid/01 4350 16 256
cache_swap_high 100
cache_swap_low 99

cache_access_log /var/log/squid.access
cache_log /var/log/squid.cache
cache_store_log none
logfile_rotate 0

cache_effective_user squid squid
pid_filename /var/run/squid.pid

request_size 1 MB
negative_ttl 5 minutes

shutdown_lifetime 10 seconds

positive_dns_ttl 3 hours
negative_dns_ttl 3 minutes
dns_children 2

acl all src 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
acl inet src 204.160.11.0/26
acl proxy src 192.168.52.0/27
acl stats src 192.168.52.128/29

acl HTTP_Ports port 21 70 80-84 1024-65535
acl SSL_Ports port 443 563 1024-65535
acl MANAGER proto cache_object
acl CONNECT method CONNECT
acl GETPOST method GET POST

http_access deny MANAGER !stats
http_access deny CONNECT !SSL_Ports
http_access deny GETPOST !HTTP_Ports
http_access allow inet
http_access allow proxy
http_access allow stats
http_access deny all

icp_access allow inet
icp_access allow proxy
icp_access deny all

never_direct allow all

cache_effective_user cache
cache_effective_group cache

-----

Thanks for any ideas,

David
Received on Fri Sep 10 1999 - 01:06:27 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:48:23 MST