Re: access.log <--> store.log

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 20:25:55 +0200

Jayakumar Srinivasan wrote:

> Now, for the second entry, why is there a FFFFFFFF file number
> for the same object and why does it get 'RELEASE'd while in fact
> it is a valid entry in the proxy cache and the accesslog shows
> it as a TCP_REFRESH_HIT/200?

It is the generated 304 "Not modified" reply sent to the client that is
being released. The filenumber is FFFFFFFF (-1) as the object does not
exists on disk (the 304 "Not modified" object this is, not the URI).

--
Henrik Nordstrom
Squid hacker
Received on Thu Apr 27 2000 - 12:45:29 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:53:05 MST