RE: Squid configuration is not optimal ?!

Have you see your Current capacity your storedir?

#client mgr:storedir
Store Directory Statistics:
Store Entries : 5739
Maximum Swap Size : 5529600 KB
Current Store Swap Size: 37839 KB
Current Capacity : 1% used, 99% free

Store Directory #0: /cache
First level subdirectories: 16
Second level subdirectories: 256
Maximum Size: 1843200 KB
Current Size: 12572 KB
Percent Used: 0.68%
....

Best regards..
Ilker G.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Marton Sándor Zoltán [mailto:sanyo@kronika.dntcj.ro]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 9:48 PM
>To: squid
>Subject: Squid configuration is not optimal ?!
>
>
>Considering the following list I supposed that my cache is not really
>that I could say excellent. The percentage of Tcphit versus TcpMiss is
>disappointing.
>The size of the cache is 1 Gb for let's say 15 constant users per day.
>They have
>Internet access for 12 hours/day(9-21) and ftp is denied. I should say
>that this clients
>visit daily mostly the same sites. And nothing fancy where the caching
>to be denied.
>So, in my opinion the daily traffic which is about 130 Mb is to much
>considering the
>above aspects. The possibility to somebody go around the cache is zero
>since the
>firewall is redirecting any 80 port traffic to squid 3128 so
>if somebody
>try to use a
>browser without using the proxys parameters the result is time-out.
>If some of you guys want to "explore" a bit my cache and help, I would
>be glad to send more details.
>Thanks
>
>
>Cache Clients:
>Address: 192.168.1.4
>Name: 192.168.1.4
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 1
> TCP_DENIED 1 100%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.9
>Name: 192.168.1.9
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 3587
> TCP_HIT 270 8%
> TCP_MISS 3003 84%
> TCP_REFRESH_HIT 86 2%
> TCP_REFRESH_MISS 12 0%
> TCP_IMS_HIT 110 3%
> TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS 6 0%
> TCP_MEM_HIT 89 2%
> TCP_DENIED 11 0%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.2
>Name: 192.168.1.2
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 6738
> NONE 6 0%
> TCP_HIT 83 1%
> TCP_MISS 4953 74%
> TCP_REFRESH_HIT 190 3%
> TCP_REFRESH_MISS 28 0%
> TCP_IMS_HIT 633 9%
> TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS 244 4%
> TCP_NEGATIVE_HIT 18 0%
> TCP_MEM_HIT 45 1%
> TCP_DENIED 538 8%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.1
>Name: 192.168.1.1
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 752
> TCP_HIT 41 5%
> TCP_MISS 642 85%
> TCP_REFRESH_HIT 2 0%
> TCP_REFRESH_MISS 1 0%
> TCP_IMS_HIT 46 6%
> TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS 2 0%
> TCP_MEM_HIT 14 2%
> TCP_DENIED 4 1%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.8
>Name: 192.168.1.8
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 7062
> TCP_HIT 139 2%
> TCP_MISS 3718 53%
> TCP_REFRESH_HIT 35 0%
> TCP_REFRESH_MISS 6 0%
> TCP_IMS_HIT 378 5%
> TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS 224 3%
> TCP_NEGATIVE_HIT 82 1%
> TCP_MEM_HIT 323 5%
> TCP_DENIED 2157 31%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.6
>Name: 192.168.1.6
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 6045
> TCP_HIT 172 3%
> TCP_MISS 4050 67%
> TCP_REFRESH_HIT 106 2%
> TCP_REFRESH_MISS 51 1%
> TCP_IMS_HIT 1244 21%
> TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS 196 3%
> TCP_NEGATIVE_HIT 38 1%
> TCP_MEM_HIT 107 2%
> TCP_DENIED 81 1%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.111
>Name: 192.168.1.111
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 2
> TCP_DENIED 2 100%
>
>Address: 127.0.0.1
>Name: localhost
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 9
> TCP_MISS 9 100%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.3
>Name: 192.168.1.3
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 11932
> TCP_HIT 497 4%
> TCP_MISS 7149 60%
> TCP_REFRESH_HIT 490 4%
> TCP_REFRESH_MISS 117 1%
> TCP_IMS_HIT 1880 16%
> TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS 455 4%
> TCP_NEGATIVE_HIT 8 0%
> TCP_MEM_HIT 225 2%
> TCP_DENIED 1111 9%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.118
>Name: 192.168.1.118
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 4005
> TCP_HIT 378 9%
> TCP_MISS 1227 31%
> TCP_REFRESH_HIT 238 6%
> TCP_REFRESH_MISS 44 1%
> TCP_IMS_HIT 1664 42%
> TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS 66 2%
> TCP_NEGATIVE_HIT 146 4%
> TCP_MEM_HIT 145 4%
> TCP_DENIED 97 2%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.119
>Name: 192.168.1.119
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 888
> TCP_HIT 86 10%
> TCP_MISS 503 57%
> TCP_REFRESH_HIT 74 8%
> TCP_IMS_HIT 181 20%
> TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS 23 3%
> TCP_MEM_HIT 5 1%
> TCP_DENIED 16 2%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.7
>Name: 192.168.1.7
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 2932
> NONE 2 0%
> TCP_HIT 250 9%
> TCP_MISS 1544 53%
> TCP_REFRESH_HIT 169 6%
> TCP_REFRESH_MISS 48 2%
> TCP_IMS_HIT 571 19%
> TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS 42 1%
> TCP_NEGATIVE_HIT 15 1%
> TCP_MEM_HIT 225 8%
> TCP_DENIED 66 2%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.5
>Name: 192.168.1.5
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 2406
> TCP_HIT 59 2%
> TCP_MISS 1684 70%
> TCP_REFRESH_HIT 76 3%
> TCP_REFRESH_MISS 24 1%
> TCP_IMS_HIT 428 18%
> TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS 54 2%
> TCP_MEM_HIT 11 0%
> TCP_DENIED 70 3%
>
>Address: 192.168.1.101
>Name: 192.168.1.101
> ICP Requests 0
> HTTP Requests 100
> TCP_MISS 74 74%
> TCP_REFRESH_MISS 1 1%
> TCP_IMS_HIT 24 24%
> TCP_DENIED 1 1%
>
>TOTALS
>ICP : 0 Queries, 0 Hits ( 0%)
>HTTP: 46459 Requests, 12096 Hits ( 26%)
>--
>Sandor Marton - System Administrator
>Technical Department - Kronika Publishing House Cluj, Romania
>Tel:+40-64-420320 Fax:+40-64-420330 Mobil:+40-94-790066
>www.kronika.dntcj.ro
>
Received on Tue Jun 20 2000 - 06:42:48 MDT