Re: [SQU] transparent VS normal proxy

From: Andrew Lowe <andrew@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 08:35:33 +1000

Just thinking that alot of the problems with transparent proxies on this
list, are due to the way they work, what with having to configure the
router, and all... maybe a better description is needed on the FAQ? but then
routers are often very different so it would be hard to write a detailed
description on how to set up transparent proxies... but i think that the FAQ
needs some more detail on transparent proxies... but it is a huge effort.
We dont run a transparent proxy here, but instead force our users to use a
proxy by running filters on our dial-in unit... that works really well, a
user can only access local sites (like our help site) without a proxy set..
we get a couple of calls, but it is easy to figure out what is wrong...

Andrew Lowe
andrew@pccentre.com.au
        The South Coast Professional Computing Centre
                + Hislora Website Hosting & Design
                + Daly & Daly Computer Training
                + Flatearth Internet Cafe
        Ph: 02 4423 7771
        Fax: 02 4423 7772
        email: sales@pccentre.com.au

----- Original Message -----
From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@hem.passagen.se>
To: Andrew Lowe <andrew@pccentre.com.au>
Cc: <squid-users@ircache.net>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: [SQU] transparent VS normal proxy

> Sort of, except that the router typically only rotes the relevant
> traffic to the proxy server without rewriting it, and the proxy server
> host then accepts it as local even if bearing a foreign IP address and
> redirects it to the proxy servers port.
>
> Quite fundamental violations of Internet Standard 5 "Internet Protocol"
> and Internet Standard 7 "Transmission Control Protocol", but some like
> it. Personally I only view it as a bandaid until better ways can be
> found, except possibly when used in firewall environments.
>
> --
> Henrik Nordstrom
> Squid hacker
>
>
> Andrew Lowe wrote:
> >
> > One thing about transparent proxies that i want to get clear....
> >
> > Is this right?
> > The request goes out to the sites router, which automatically redirects
(it
> > needs to be configured to do this) all trafic on the port 80, that is
not
> > from the proxy. to the proxy on port 3128, or whatever port the proxy is
> > configured to run on.
> >
> > So if any traffic is going out on port 80 (http) and is not from the
proxy
> > server, it gets routed to the proxy, which then accepts the request, and
> > gets it itself.
> >
> > Andrew Lowe
> > andrew@pccentre.com.au
> > The South Coast Professional Computing Centre
> > + Hislora Website Hosting & Design
> > + Daly & Daly Computer Training
> > + Flatearth Internet Cafe
> > Ph: 02 4423 7771
> > Fax: 02 4423 7772
> > email: sales@pccentre.com.au
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <fabian1@servinet.net.ar>
> > To: <squid-users@ircache.net>
> > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 5:59 PM
> > Subject: [SQU] transparent VS normal proxy
> >
> > > I use linux suse 6.3 + ipchains + squid (transparent mode)
> > > Why when I set my internet explorer 5 to use proxy (squid) y very
> > > fastest that using transparent mode proxy???..
> > > May be an wrong set in my squid.conf?
> > > Sorry for my english.
> > > Regards
> > > Fabian
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
>

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
Received on Sun Aug 27 2000 - 16:36:33 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:55:06 MST