Re: [SQU] any bugs with 2.2.17 & squid ?

From: Max V. Bouglacoff <vesemir@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:20:51 +0300 (EEST)

On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Murat CANDAN wrote:

> Well,
>
> I think that it is a period which leads to that cry.
>
> 2000/10/03 18:10:30| WARNING! Your cache is running out of
> filedescriptors
> is what i found later on the logs.
>
> Still, to talk about the subject of the mail, i did not had such
> problems
> with 2.2.16. Or i think so. not any other guy?

Hiya,

I'm running squid-2.3STABLE4 with all patches on PIII box with 2.2.17 during
a week or so. No problems.

Btw, I've made some interesting observations. I have two boxes with squids
on them. One of them has 12GB cache and squid process takes nearly 110MB of
RAM. Another one has 24G cache and squid takes ~210MB. Both caches have
`cache_mem' set to 10MB. So, if someone plans to buy hardware for proxy
server it should keep proportion between disk space and RAM size something
like "1GB of disk uses 10MB of RAM"

Regards!

---------------------------------------------
Max V. Bouglacoff
Co-Administrator & Programmer of ISP `Farlep'
vesemir@iname.com

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
Received on Tue Oct 03 2000 - 13:23:33 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:55:41 MST