Re: [SQU] solved?? (was: cache too big!)

From: Markus Stumpf <maex-squid-users@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:40:47 +0100

Hoi folx,

On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:59:04PM +0100, Markus Stumpf wrote:
> Now there is a hardcoded timeout of 15 seconds that seems to take effect
> in case squid cleaned an "empty" directory, which causes squid to
> simply sleep 2 whole days cleaning the empty L2 directories.
> (This 15 seconds value occurs two times in store_dir_ufs.c).
>
> What I did tonight is change the 15 seconds timeout to a 5 seconds
> [ ... ]
> I'll keep watching the evolution closely and keep you informed ;-)

This is an update.
Although the change from 15 to 5 seconds brought some immediate success
it hasn't brought a long term solution.

I have then changed the 5 seconds to 1 second and since that squid
is really cleaning up and freeing *disk space*
The values about how much disk space squid thinks it's using and
the number of objects in the cache are not influenced and keep
stable.
Also the HTTP service time didn't change because of that modification
as didn't other performance related parameters, AFAICS.

        \Maex

-- 
SpaceNet AG               |   http://www.Space.Net/   | Stress is when you wake
Research & Development    | mailto:maex-sig@Space.Net | up screaming and you
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 |  Tel: +49 (89) 32356-0    | realize you haven't
D-80807 Muenchen          |  Fax: +49 (89) 32356-299  | fallen asleep yet.
--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
Received on Wed Dec 20 2000 - 14:50:22 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:57:03 MST