Re: [SQU] improving performance by acls?

From: Thomas Adam <thomas_adam16@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 10:42:47 -0800 (PST)

Hi,

You are possibly in the right direction. By using
ACL's it does give you more flexability over control.
As far as performance goes, I would hazard a guess
that the longer the list in the ACL, the slower it
gets, but only very very very very very very
unoticable.

Hope that helps,

Thomas Adam
re: thomas_adam16@yahoo.com
--- gv_squid <ven_squid@yahoo.com> wrote: >
> Hi folks,
>
> I am thinking why can i try to improve the
> performance of squid by some acls.
> ie I am trying to do the some functionalities, which
> L7 switches normally do with Squid.
> By using URLs we can identify whether requested
> objects are cachable or not. If not, requests can be
> passed to origin server by always_direct Directive
> in squid.conf.
>
> Note:
> I am using Transparent caching.
>
> Am i in the right direction?
> If so, How much (%) we can improve ?
>
> Thanks,
> Venkatesh.
>
>
>
>

=====
Thomas Adam
Linux Co-ordinator for The Purbeck School

e-mail (school): n6tadam@users.purbeck.dorset.sch.uk
e-mail (yahoo) : thomas_adam16@yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

--
To unsubscribe, see http://www.squid-cache.org/mailing-lists.html
Received on Tue Feb 20 2001 - 11:47:01 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:58:05 MST