RE: [squid-users] Cache peer access - or - The redirection problem...

From: Michael C. Jett <jettm@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:41:55 -0500

Have you thought about using a single squid server and delay pools? I'm not
extrememly familiar with them but it sounds like they would do what you
want.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simone Colombo [mailto:scolombo@saitweb.it]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 12:17 PM
> To: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Cc: marco.lacava@saitweb.it
> Subject: [squid-users] Cache peer access - or - The redirection
> problem...
>
>
> Hi all!
>
> We are trying to set up a Squid hierarchy to work as follow:
>
> A central proxy server must authenticate the user (via ncsa_auth
> module) and
> then redirect them ( via ICP now, but no problems using something
> other) on a
> different parent choosen from an array. We MUST have users (or
> users group) pass
> on different parent proxyes (users have different bandwith
> privileges) and the
> selection must be done on the username, not on the client's ip,
> 'cuz we have a
> lot of roaming users that use dhcp.
>
>
> So... we try the following acls:
>
> <snip>
> acl USER1 proxy_auth user1
> acl USER2 proxy_auth user2
>
> cache_peer x.x.x.x parent 3128 3130
> cache_peer y.y.y.y parent 3128 3130
>
> cache_peer_acces x.x.x.x allow user1
> cache_peer_acces x.x.x.x deny all
>
> cache_peer_access y.y.y.y allow user2
> cache_peer_access y.y.y.y deny all
> <snip>
> EOF
>
> Squid does complain 'bout nothing in the logfiles, but it seems it
> ignores the "permissions" we've setted up... actually it uses its
> peers whit the
> standard policy (the fastest answering).
>
> Does anyone know why or as suggestion on how to realize the same
> thing in a different way?
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 03 2001 - 12:42:29 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 16:59:08 MST