RE: [squid-users] Re: Squid delay pools using DS/Precedence field to limit BW

From: David Wilson <>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 08:52:17 +0200

Hi Pedro,

That will be great ! If there's anyway I can help to please let me know, I'd
be more than willing to assist.
Many thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pedro Ribeiro []
Sent: 22 November 2001 09:30
To: David Wilson
Cc: Squid-Users@Squid-Cache. Org
Subject: [squid-users] Re: Squid delay pools using DS/Precedence field
to limit BW

That's an interesting acl to do ... probably also applicable to our network,
at this moment i don't know any easy way to do it, i'll try to create that
acl in a less busy day ...

Best Regards.

PS: Thanks for the mention of the patches i'v made for Linux it's the best
reward to know that my work is also usefull to someone!

  Pedro Ribeiro
  IRC(PTnet) Nick: PAntMaR
  e-Mail: Spamm:
               IPLNet/ISELNet Admin:
  PGP Key Available in keyservers.
  PGPFP: 6430 6CA7 7642 36D6 718B A884 FDF0 E8F1 30EA 1D19
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Wilson" <>
To: <>
Cc: "Squid-Users@Squid-Cache. Org" <>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 12:02 PM
Subject: Squid delay pools using DS/Precedence field to limit BW

> Hi Pedro & all
> Well done on your Squid patches! They look great.
> I've desperately been looking for some answers for about 2 years now
> regarding setting up Squid ACL's to match on IP DS/Precedence bit fields
> that I can apply them to Squid's delay pools.
> Please have a look at my posts below if you have time.
> If you could help in anyway possible I'd really appreciate it.
> Another possibility of course is that if I could get Squid not to reset
> original DS/precedence bit field I could put a Packeteer between our
> and our Squid proxy. At the moment Squid resets the original value so it
> shows up as marked with a 0, "no value" so that doesn't work to well, if
> anyone can think of a patch that well tell Squid to keep the original
> DS/Precedence bit value please let me know.
> Anyone that can help on squid-users is welcome to mail me back, I'd
> appreciate it.
> Many thanks.
Received on Thu Nov 22 2001 - 23:52:43 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:04:27 MST