Re: [squid-users] squid2.4stable3 on BSDI 4.1 - diskd or asynchronies I/O

From: Account For Cache Group <cachemail@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:23:41 +0330 (IRT)

it seems that on BSD "diskd" has a better perfomance. but in linux
asynchronies I/O is better.

With Regards
--Mahmoud Taghizadeh

On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Zand, Nooshin wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a plan to deploy squid2.4STABLE3. I already compiled the code with
> asynchronies IO.
> Would you please let me know which one give me better performance.
>
> Here is the system configuration:
> COMPAQ DL 380
> BSDI 4.1
> Duel processor
> 1G RAM
> 2G SWAP
> 3x18G drive for cache (Configured with RAID 0)
>
> Thanks,
> Nooshin
>
Received on Sat Jan 12 2002 - 01:55:57 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:05:50 MST