Re: [squid-users] Transparently redirecting HTTPS requests

From: Joe Cooper <joe@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 02:20:22 -0500

By port-based redirect, you mean you don't need proxying at all? If
not, go back to figuring out an iptables solution. Though I still don't
quite know what you want to accomplish and why Squid comes into the
equation at all.

Ali Resting wrote:
> Hi Joe
> Thanks for the response. Are you aware of any other solutions to tackle this
> problem with. I am not really looking at a caching solution but rather a
> port based redirect.
>
> Ali Resting
> Director
> Real Image Internet
> http://www.swazi.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Cooper [mailto:joe@swelltech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:31 PM
> To: Ali Resting
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Transparently redirecting HTTPS requests
>
>
> Ali Resting wrote:
>
>>Has anyone been able to successfully transperently redirect https requests
>>to squid on RedHat 7.2. I can successfully do it using iptables with DNAT
>
> if
>
>>the client specifies the proxy server and port on their browser, but I am
>>trying to avoid this.
>
>
> Can't be done. Squid does not support transparent proxying of SSL
> traffic. Search the archives for more in-depth discussion of this.
> Henrik, particularly, has said many interesting things on the subject.
> --
> Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
> Web caching appliances and support.
> http://www.swelltech.com
>
>

-- 
Joe Cooper <joe@swelltech.com>
Web caching appliances and support.
http://www.swelltech.com
Received on Thu Oct 24 2002 - 01:17:41 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:10:53 MST