Re: [squid-users] some Sites are not working!!

From: Juergen Lucka <lucka@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:43:20 +0100

Thanks all for your reply!!

Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Juergen Lucka

mailto:lucka@dw-westfalen.de
(EDV-Koordination)
Diakonisches Werk Westfalen
Tel.:0251,2709-731
Fax:0251,2709-55731
--- Nachricht erstellt mit The Bat! 1.61 ---

----- Original Message -----
am am 11:11:48 [GMT+0100] schrieben Sie:
Von : hno@marasystems.com
AN : shermanw@catalinaasia.com
Betreff: [squid-users] some Sites are not working!!

> Because a certain very big company did not read the HTTP specifications
> when implementing their "integrated login" schemes (NTLM and then
> Negotiate), and as a result their design is in violation to fundamental
> aspects of the HTTP specification and cannot be proxied by standard HTTP
> proxies who try to follow the specifications (not even their own proxy).

> Regards
> Henrik

> "Wong, Sherman" wrote:

>> I supposed authentication e.g. basic, is setup for authenticate users to use
>> the cache. When the Web server needs authentication, it has nothing to do
>> with the squid. Since the squid does not cache passwords. So it just forward
>> the request. In that sense, why would the authentication method e.g. digest
>> or ntlm possibly affecting the authentication process to the destination
>> web server??

--
Received on Thu Nov 28 2002 - 07:43:52 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:11:37 MST