Re: [squid-users] Anything wrong with this?

From: Ling Hwa Hing <hwahing@dont-contact.us>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:48:04 +0800

Hi Nick,
high memory and scsi hard disk will run faster.
IDE wont help on speed while your box accessing the small file on disk.

At 10:37 PM 12/2/2002 -0600, Nick Lomonte wrote:
>We are an ISP with ~6k subscribers. I recently set up Squid on a test box
>to run for a day and measure how much bandwidth it saved, and surprisingly
>it cut down our internet bandwidth by about 2 megabits (out of 9mb at peak
>times).
>
>That said, we want to implement this permenantly. The response times were
>fairly slow on the test box. It was a celeron 600/256mb/20gig HD, but it
>was also running a few other things which is probably the cause of the
>slowness. It gets about 3100 requests per minute on average.
>
>Is the following machine too much/too little for our purposes?
>P4 - 1.5ghz, 512mb RAM, 120gb IDE HD. The 120gig HD will be for cache only,
>with a smaller 20g drive for the OS.
>
>Am I correct in assuming that the larger the cache storage is, the more
>bandwidth it will potentially save?
Received on Mon Dec 02 2002 - 21:47:35 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:11:49 MST