Re: [squid-users] 2.4.20-aa and LARGE Squid process -> SIGSEGV

* Robert Collins <robertc@squid-cache.org>:

> > It doesn't. It's simply logging the restart, but not the crash!
>
> Ok, so follow the FAQ and get us a stacktrace.

Will do

> > See attached log - not entirely illuminating (for the unitiated?)
>
> Nothing useful there, but we did need to check :}.

At least I'm not blind.

> > The BUG? Which BUG? :) Note that our problem occurs with both ufs and
> > aufs.
>
> The 'recently found aufs bug that could impact you'.

Oh shit. It seems I'll repackage 2.5 as Debian package and give the
maintainer a hint that he should "track the upstream" more closely.

Right now, we will be switching over to diskd, since everybody seems
to agree that it's better than (a)ufs.

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a)   Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de
Charite Campus Mitte                            Tel.  +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Referat V a - Kommunikationsnetze -             Fax.  +49 (0)30-450 570-916
"A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in
human history - with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila." 
-- Mitch Ratliffe