Re: [squid-users] Async I/O with Linux

On Wed, 2003-01-01 at 00:51, Brian E. Seppanen wrote:
> I'm doing some testing and I've run squid for about two weeks under load
> with diskd and I can not get much better than a 35% hit rate, while I have
> several Sun E250's that are routinely doing 50-45% using ufs.

Well, disk space is the prime reason for a low hit rate, that and your
cache policies. if everything else is equal, changing from ufs to aufs
will *only* drop your hit rate if you have an overloaded disk subsystem,
causing aufs to shed IO load.

Cheers,
Rob