Re: [squid-users] hyperthreading?

From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:49:40 +0100

Yes, maybe if you have redirectors who are CPU hungry. If not you are
still likely to be hurt more by the SMP kernel overhead penalty than
gained..

Regards
Henrik

sean.upton@uniontrib.com wrote:
>
> Hmm. This could be useful on a cache that makes use of redirectors and has
> complicated and/or interpreted redirector processes and high traffic, no?
> This is assuming you bind the Squid's processor affinity to a single
> physcial/logical CPU (i.e. with Linux schedutils).
>
> Sean
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:34 AM
> To: Wei Keong
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] hyperthreading?
>
> Estimate: Not much, if any.
>
> Squid cannot utilize SMP very good, and enabling SMP support (required
> for HT) in the OS significantly slows down most things used by Squid...
>
> Maybe a gain can be seen if you compile Squid with the Intel ICC
> compiler with support for automatic threading, but only if you are in
> the situation that your Squid is seriously CPU bound.
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
> Wei Keong wrote:
> >
> > Was reading up on this and wondering if hyperthreading will improve squid
> > performance... anyone tried this, any input?
> >
> > http://www17.tomshardware.com/cpu/20021202/index.html
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Wei Keong
Received on Wed Jan 15 2003 - 15:54:52 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:12:41 MST