Re: [squid-users] squid and XFS?

From: Stephen J. McCracken <smccrack@dont-contact.us>
Date: 03 Jun 2003 11:37:58 -0500

> It is faster than XFS. Due to bad experiences with ReiserFS in the
> past, we never use it.

Could you elaborate on the "bad experiences"? We are rolling out squid
& reiserfs 3.6 since support is included in RH7.3 and xfs is not. But
if there are other issues, we might rethink that issue.
Received on Tue Jun 03 2003 - 10:40:32 MDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Aaron Kenny: "[squid-users] Squid keeps dies with redirectors"
Previous message: Samuel Abreu de Paula: "[squid-users] Hude store.log file!"
In reply to: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: [squid-users] squid and XFS?"
Next in thread: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] squid and XFS?"
Reply: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] squid and XFS?"
Reply: Ralf Hildebrandt: "Re: [squid-users] squid and XFS?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:17:14 MST