Re: [squid-users] squid and XFS?

From: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@dont-contact.us>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:23:17 +0200

* Stephen J. McCracken <smccrack@hcjb.org.ec>:

> > It is faster than XFS. Due to bad experiences with ReiserFS in the
> > past, we never use it.
>
> Could you elaborate on the "bad experiences"?

Totally destroyed filesystems - unrecoverable. While I worked at innominate.com,
everybody tried it, and everybody had Totally destroyed filesystems.
But that's 2 years ago now.

> We are rolling out squid & reiserfs 3.6 since support is included in
> RH7.3 and xfs is not. But if there are other issues, we might
> rethink that issue.

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a)   Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de
Charite Campus Mitte                            Tel.  +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Referat V a - Kommunikationsnetze -             Fax.  +49 (0)30-450 570-916
AIM: ralfpostfix
Received on Wed Jun 04 2003 - 03:23:24 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:17:14 MST