"Ethy H. Brito" wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:20:24 +0200
> "Marc Elsen" <marc.elsen@imec.be> wrote:
>
> > > Couldn find anything in the logs that mention access or store log
> > > files.
> > Any extra info in the beginning of cache.log and the end of
> > cache.log.0
> > when this is being tried (examine both files (!)). ?
>
> Surprisingly YES. A SEG Violation in all of cache.log.[0-3] files.
> Look:
>
> # head cache.log
>
> 2003/06/10 04:00:00| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting...
> FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying.
> 2003/06/10 04:00:02| storeDirWriteCleanLogs: Starting...
> 2003/06/10 04:00:02| Finished. Wrote 5566 entries.
> 2003/06/10 04:00:02| Took 0.0 seconds (118362.6 entries/sec).
> CPU Usage: 65.560 seconds = 45.030 user + 20.530 sys
> Maximum Resident Size: 0 KB
> Page faults with physical i/o: 340
> Memory usage for squid via mallinfo():
> total space in arena: 7300 KB
> Ordinary blocks: 7279 KB 23 blks
> Small blocks: 0 KB 0 blks
> Holding blocks: 192 KB 1 blks
> Free Small blocks: 0 KB
> Free Ordinary blocks: 20 KB
> Total in use: 7471 KB 102%
> Total free: 20 KB 0%
> 2003/06/10 04:00:12| Starting Squid Cache version 2.5.STABLE3-20030605
> for i586- pc-linux-gnu...
> 2003/06/10 04:00:12| Process ID 2323
>
> >
> > Which version of squid are you using ?
> > On which platform/os/version ?
>
> squid-2.5.STABLE3-20030605
> Linux Slackware 9.0 Kernel 2.4.20 on a Pentium 166Mhz w/128MB RAM
>
> What now?
Since, this is about the latest release, I guess filing a bug report
would be the most appropriat thing to do ,
M.
Received on Wed Jun 11 2003 - 01:01:15 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:17:19 MST