Re: [squid-users] Speed : SQUID vs MS proxy

From: Robert Collins <robertc@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:39:04 +0800

On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 15:14, aqil wrote:
> Pada 08-Sep-2003, Robert Collins menulis:
> > On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 14:16, aqil wrote:
> > > Here are the specs of the hardwares :
> > > SQUID:
> >
> > What version of squid?
> > What cache_dir line are you using?
>
> squid-2.5.STABLE3 I think...
> cache_dir ufs /cache 2000 16 256
>
> [root@proxy etc]# df
> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda7 3281088 1467584 1646832 48% /cache

Ok, well for low load, ufs is ok. Usually slow response in a low load
situate is DNS related - or perhaps the OS tcp stack needs a little
tuning.

Cheers,
Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.

Received on Sun Sep 14 2003 - 21:07:14 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tue Dec 09 2003 - 17:19:51 MST