Re: [squid-users] Squid versus Microsoft ISA

From: Serassio Guido <guido.serassio@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 16:58:08 +0100

Hi Dave,

At 16.41 04/12/2003, Dave Augustus wrote:

>Hello All,
>
>Realizing that most on this list are biased against Microsoft, I am
>asking you to put your biases aside and answer this question:
>
>Why should I as a manager consider using Squid over Microsoft ISA in an
>(almost) entirely Microsoft shop if neither solution is deployed yet?

Microsoft ISA Server service are:

- Firewall
- Web Proxy server
- Socks Server
- Winsock Proxy Server (with Firewall client installed)

All service are integrated with Windows domain security.

If you are interested in Winsock proxy, currently there aren't any other
option.

If you are looking for a Web proxy only, Squid is more flexible than ISA
Server and is full integrated with Windows domain security (NTLM
authentication).

Regards

Guido

-
========================================================
Guido Serassio
Acme Consulting S.r.l.
Via Gorizia, 69 10136 - Torino - ITALY
Tel. : +39.011.3249426 Fax. : +39.011.3293665
Email: guido.serassio@acmeconsulting.it
WWW: http://www.acmeconsulting.it/
Received on Thu Dec 04 2003 - 08:58:20 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Jan 01 2004 - 12:00:05 MST