[squid-users] RAM/cache size limitations

From: Paul Seaman <paul.seaman@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 13:58:22 -0600

Hey guys.

I have a PIII 1.3GHz (512MB of RAM) squid cache machine with a 160GB secondary drive that I was going to use for a UFS cache. Are there limitations on suggested cache size compared to available RAM, or will this work OK as a 350+ user webcache? I guess what I'm asking is if it'll be ok to use the full 160GB, or if I should use a smaller cache_dir.

Paul
Received on Mon Mar 08 2004 - 12:58:23 MST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Mueller, Rex: "[squid-users] Sizing Squid and WCCP caching for large enterprise.."
Previous message: SMORRIS@dont-contact.us: "[squid-users] Which MAC does a Miss take?"
Next in thread: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] RAM/cache size limitations"
Reply: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: [squid-users] RAM/cache size limitations"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 12:00:01 MST