Re: [squid-users] download.windowsupdate.com

From: Merton Campbell Crockett <mcc@dont-contact.us>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 06:54:43 -0700 (PDT)

On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Brett Glass wrote:

> At 09:20 AM 7/17/2004, Merton Campbell Crockett wrote:
>
> >Microsoft has changed how updates are performed and now uses an SSL
> >connection for the actual download.
>
> While it WOULD be like Microsoft to do that (thereby ensuring that it
> can track every individual user of its products), it is not what we're
> seeing at all in this case. Windows Update runs through the cache.
> And messes it up.

I have several Squid proxy caches running in a production environment but
haven't encountered any problems with the cacheable content from Windows
Update "messing" up the cache. Other than the basic Windows Update page
there is little cacheable content.

I have Squid configured as a load-balanced array and hierarchy; however, I
use the default hierarchy_stoplist and no_cache settings. Also, I don't
use any redirectors.

At any rate, I've not had any problems with cacheing Windows Update
content that is cacheable.

Merton Campbell Crockett

-- 
BEGIN:				vcard
VERSION:			3.0
FN:				Merton Campbell Crockett
ORG:				General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems;
				Intelligence and Exploitation Systems
N:				Crockett;Merton;Campbell
EMAIL;TYPE=internet:		mcc@CATO.GD-AIS.COM
TEL;TYPE=work,voice,msg,pref:	+1(805)497-5045
TEL;TYPE=work,fax:		+1(805)497-5050
TEL;TYPE=cell,voice,msg:	+1(805)377-6762
END:				vcard
Received on Sun Jul 18 2004 - 07:55:53 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Aug 01 2004 - 12:00:02 MDT