On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Thien Vu wrote:
> I'll take a look at it. I think it was to keep the format simpler
> because the majority of the acls are url_regexes. But I don't think
> this is the problem.
Most ofthen the situation should be the reverse, with url_regex being the
minority only used when none of all the other acl types is suitable.
> I haven't looked at how the ACLs are evaluated and if re-ordering them
> would help. Is this a worthwhile idea?
Only if you find that ACL processing is the bottleneck.
Regards
Henrik
Received on Sun May 01 2005 - 15:47:41 MDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 12:00:02 MDT