RE: [squid-users] squid 2.5 - ipf transparent proxy - FreeBSD 5.3-p13

From: Martijn Broeders - HUB Labs <m.broeders@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 20:58:09 +0200

Hello,

The patch didn't make any difference, I still got the core dump.

I found something else. To redirect port 80 lan-traffic to my
squid server I had the following line in my ipnat.conf:

rdr em0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 172.16.0.3 port 8080 tcp

When I change this line to:

rdr em0 172.16.0.0/16 port 80 -> 172.16.0.3 port 8080 tcp

...the core dump doesn't occur anymore!

BUT, now there is something else. My squid server didn't log
anything anymore in the access.log en store.log files. There is
even nothing cached anymore in the cache directories!

Best regards,
Martijn

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 4:53 PM
> To: Martijn Broeders - HUB Labs
> Cc: Squid Users
> Subject: RE: [squid-users] squid 2.5 - ipf transparent proxy
> - FreeBSD 5.3-p13
>
> On Thu, 26 May 2005, Martijn Broeders - HUB Labs wrote:
>
> > The problem described below has got something to do with ipf
> > transparent proxying and the STABLE10 version.
>
> This would be the squid-2.5.STABLE9-transparent_port.patch.
>
> Please try if the attached patch makes any difference.
>
> > Is ipfilter version 3.4.x not supported anymore in the STABLE10
> > version (because I read that STABLE10 supports ipfilter version
> > 4.x now)? Is it a FreeBSD issue?
>
> It is supposed to be supported, just as it was in 2.5.STABLE9
> and earlier.
>
> As I did not have means to verify these changes there was
> several calls
> for help with verifying the interception on different OS:es
> but nobody
> reported any problems with FreeBSD..
>
> Regards
> Henrik
>
Received on Thu May 26 2005 - 12:58:17 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wed Jun 01 2005 - 12:00:03 MDT