Re: [squid-users] mount options for cache_dir

> On Thu, 26 May 2005, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> >However, some researches documented that reiserfs is not good FS for things
> >like squid cache and that ext3 is faster...

On 27.05 07:51, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> And several has the exact opposite results..

Of course, for example there are people that do not know the 'notail' option
for reisersfs ;)

I just want to say that some people prefer ext3 over reiserfs. basically,
used options were well-tuned for squid cache directory.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
   One OS to rule them all, One OS to find them, 
One OS to bring them all and into darkness bind them