Re: [squid-users] cache_peer question

Kashif Ali Bukhari wrote:

>user carp and recompile squid using --enable-carp
>cache_peer parent-cache1 parent 3128 3130 no-query proxy-only
>carp-load-factor=.34
>cache_peer parent-cache2 parent 3128 3130 no-query proxy-only
>carp-load-factor=.33
>cache_peer parent-cache3 parent 3128 3130 no-query proxy-only
>carp-load-factor=.33
>
>On 8/5/05, Askar <askar@askarali.info> wrote:
>
>
>>hi list
>>
>> I want to configure a cache server which have three parents. Do
>>a child have more then on parent ? :), what i'm doing atm is something
>>like this.....
>>
>>
>>cache_peer parent-cache1 parent 3128 3130 no-query proxy-only
>>cache_peer parent-cache2 parent 3128 3130 no-query proxy-only
>>cache_peer parent-cache3 parent 3128 3130 no-query proxy-only
>>
>>However when i check on parent proxy i could see only parent-cache1 got
>>the request not the others. So what exactly i want to choose parent in
>>round robin fashion.
>>
>>secondly if the child cache request an object from parents it serve it
>>without caching it local is "no-query proxy-only" is right for that purpose?
>>
>>
>>any help in this regards will be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>regards
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
what about going wihtout carp ? like .......

cache_peer parent-cache1 parent 3128 3130 round-robin no-query
cache_peer parent-cache2 parent 3128 3130 round-robin no-query
cache_peer parent-cache3 parent 3128 3130 round-robin no-query

I thinks round-robin kinda cool in this case eh ?

regards
Received on Fri Aug 05 2005 - 01:20:31 MDT