[squid-users] refresh_stale_hit -> refresh_stale_window?

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@dont-contact.us>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:03:51 -0700

Looking through the source of P3, I *think* what's documented as
refresh_stale_hit is actually coded as refresh_stale_window -- the
only place the former occurs is in comments, the config file and the
release notes, while the latter is used throughout client_side.c and
refresh.c.

Is this a known problem, and should it work to just use
refresh_stale_window in P3?

Cheers,

--
Mark Nottingham
mnot@yahoo-inc.com
Received on Mon Sep 11 2006 - 16:04:08 MDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sun Oct 01 2006 - 12:00:03 MDT