Re: [squid-users] aufs vs diskd

On 12.09.06 17:16, Anton Glinkov wrote:
> when using aufs the store rebuilding is done MUCH faster compared to
> diskd. But when using diskd, once the store is rebuilt the load average is
> always lower than 1. With aufs it is usually above 2. The CPU time is done
> mostly by iowait. There is plenty of memory on the machine. It doesn't run
> any other services.
>
> So which one should i use?

Do you care about speed or the load average? Is the number more important
than performance?

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm.