Re: [squid-users] Forwarding loop

From: John Halfpenny <jhalfpenny@dont-contact.us>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:44:34 -0500 (EST)

Hi Henrik,

Checked and they are different. I'm getting this in the log

2007/01/11 15:34:57| WARNING: Forwarding loop detected for:
Client: 127.0.0.1 http_port: 127.0.0.1:3128
GET http://localhost/squid-internal-dynamic/netdb HTTP/1.0
Host: localhost:8081
Via: 1.0 SquidA:8080 (squid/2.6.STABLE5), 1.0 SquidC:3128 (squid/2.6.STABLE5)
X-Forwarded-For: unknown, 127.0.0.1
Cache-Control: max-age=259200
Connection: Close

2007/01/11 15:35:02| WARNING: Forwarding loop detected for:
Client: 127.0.0.1 http_port: 127.0.0.1:3129
GET http://localhost/squid-internal-dynamic/netdb HTTP/1.0
Host: localhost:9091
Via: 1.0 SquidB:9090 (squid/2.6.STABLE5), 1.0 SquidC:3128 (squid/2.6.STABLE5)
X-Forwarded-For: unknown, 127.0.0.1
Cache-Control: max-age=259200
Connection: Close

Something odd is going on as it mentions SquidC:3128 in both reports. The bottom report should connect to C on port 3129, or I would have thought... the two dansguardian instances reflect the correct port numbers in their respective config files.

Any thoughts?

John

 --- On Thu 01/11, Henrik Nordstrom < henrik@henriknordstrom.net > wrote:
From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto: henrik@henriknordstrom.net]
To: jhalfpenny@excite.com
     Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:22:05 +0100
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Forwarding loop

tor 2007-01-11 klockan 05:40 -0500 skrev John Halfpenny:> The system is reporting routing loops on instance C at port 3128 via 8080 and 9090. Why is this?Triple-check your visible_hostname settings. C MUST be different from Aand B.RegardsHenrikAttachment: signature.asc (0.31KB)

_______________________________________________
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
Received on Thu Jan 11 2007 - 08:44:47 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thu Feb 01 2007 - 12:00:01 MST